Academics warn restrictive regulation has unintended consequences

BEAMSVILLE, Ontario, September 17, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) – A group of 15 scientists specializing in addiction and tobacco research have published an essay, published by the American Public Health Association, calling for a more balanced approach of the vaping regulations. When a group of scientists join forces to advocate for the potential public health benefits of vaping, governments around the world should heed it. A revealing section of their trial focuses on how vaping can increase smoking cessation, which has been proven by several research methods including randomized studies, population studies, and cigarette sales.

The Canadian Vaping Association (CVA) has raised concerns over Canada’s current proposed flavor ban and excise tax on the grounds that such regulation would reduce the appeal of vaping and lead to an increase in vaping. smoking rates. The CVA’s concerns have often been dismissed as selfish, but the publication of this paper by highly credible tobacco and addiction researchers should cause regulators to reassess the evidence on vaping.

“A study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that in 2018, 15.1% of smokers quit for 6 months or more using e-cigarettes, compared to 3.3% using other products from the tobacco other than cigarettes and 6.6% by not using any tobacco product, ”said the authors.

The authors cite several studies that demonstrate how vaping was found to be more effective than nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and note that “the results of population studies are consistent with a near doubling of the success of attempts to stopping, found in randomized controlled trials, and the fact that e-cigarettes are the most used aid by smokers to quit smoking.

They leave no room for uncertainty by stating that “smokers unable to quit smoking with evidence-based cessation methods should be well informed about the relative risks of vaping and smoking and the potential of vaping to help them. to quit smoking ”.

Research indicates that cigarettes and vaping products substitute for each other, resulting in positive cross-price elasticity of demand that is sensitive to any change in the price of items. The author shares this example: “One study linked a Minnesota e-cigarette tax to increased adult smoking and reduced withdrawal, finding that taxing e-cigarettes at the same rate as cigarettes in the United States. nationwide could deter 2.75 million smokers from quitting over a decade. The likelihood of current vapers choosing to resume smoking would be a devastating setback for Canada. This price sensitivity has already been seen in Nova Scotia, as many vapers returned to tobacco or began purchasing their vaping products on the black market after the ban and taxation of flavors was put in place. artwork.

Vaping has proven to be an effective harm reduction tool for smokers looking for an alternative to tobacco. Vaping can be an effective quit smoking aid, however, taxes and flavor bans can negate any positive results that might be achieved. The rejection of science by Canadian health authorities is draining the public of accessible and proven tools. Vaping has successfully disrupted tobacco use by modernizing options for smokers. Thanks to vaping, Canada has seen remarkable reductions in smoking rates that have stagnated for years.

Darryl Storm
Executive director
[email protected]

Source link

About Aldrich Stanley

Aldrich Stanley

Check Also

Rising seafood prices could impact Thanksgiving spending

Inflation that drives seafood prices higher may discourage Americans from indulging during the Thanksgiving holidays, …